Personal tools
You are here: Home Research Corner: Usability of touchscreen devices
Wireless RERC
MyWirelessReview is a vision of the Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center for Wireless Technologies, Wireless RERC.

The Wireless RERC promotes equitable access to and use of wireless technologies by people with disabilities and encourages adoption of universal design in future generations of wireless devices and applications through research, development, and training activities.
Log in


Forgot your password?
New user?
 
Document Actions

Research Corner: Usability of touchscreen devices

Research Corner: Usability of touchscreen devices

iPhone mounted on motorized chair arm next to joystick controller.

With so many touchscreen devices on the market, the Wireless RERC has been working with members of our Consumer Advisory Network to find out how usable these devices really are.

In 2009 testers with low vision, manual limitations, and/or cognitive limitations used the iPhone 3G, Blackberry Storm, and HTC Touch HD over several days. No single device was the "winner" of this comparison, but each presented both virtues and challenges.

Below are some of the findings. We look forward to sharing more of the results with MyWirelessReview readers and learning about your experiences as well.

touchscreen comments

Posted by james mueller at 2009-10-12 08:43
After using each of the devices for a few days, our 13 testers had definite likes and dislikes about each of the three...

The iPhone 3G got high marks for its "user friendliness". Strong, distinctive graphic design of each application symbol made selecting from the home screen easier than the others, especially for those with visual or cognitive limitations.

The Blackberry Storm earned praise for its "click-through" screen which allows the user to highlight a choice before selecting it, then gives a tactile click when the choice is made. Users with limited coordination found this helpful.

The HTC Touch HD was the only device of the three that allows use of a stylus. Nearly all testers appreciated this, since it increased precision in using the touchscreen, whether with the stylus, a fingernail, or a knuckle. The stylus also improved screen visibility, since it obstructed less of the screen than the user's hand.

stylus options

Posted by james mueller at 2010-01-16 08:07
Since so many of our testers appreciated the stylus of the HTC Touch HD, we expect that many of our visitors will be interested in the options for adding a stylus to the iPhone, Storm, and other devices that use capacitative touchscreen technology. Here are a few, including an interesting idea for making your own stylus! If you've tried any of these, please share your experiences...

http://www.tenonedesign.com/stylus.php

http://www.repairsuniverse.com/iphonepenb.html

http://pocketnow.com/tech-news/htc-hd2-capacitive-touchscreen-stylus-now-shipping

http://shop.brando.com/dagi-transparent-capacitive-touch-panel-stylus_p04019c0197d031.html

http://www.gottabemobile.com/2009/06/03/how-to-make-your-own-capacitive-touch-stylus-sort-of

Tester's first experiences

Posted by james mueller at 2009-10-21 09:34
Getting Started

The majority of the testers had little experience with touchscreen smartphones like those tested. Success or frustration with the first few tasks made a big difference in their confidence in completing the tests. For example, when the iPhone was switched on, the touchscreen presented a "Slide to Unlock" task on the touchscreen. Testers with manual limitations, as well as those with low vision or cognitive limitations, found this easy to do. This successful introduction to using the touchscreen encouraged them to explore the device further. In a similar way, the Storm presented a step-by-step tutorial when the device was first switched on, introducing the device's features and operations to the first-time user.

accessibility options

Posted by james mueller at 2009-11-05 09:16
One of the first tasks each tester performed was the selection of text (font) size, screen brightness, audio volume, and other options. This was a good thing, since some testers found using the device very difficult until these options were selected. These testers observed that setting up the device requires dependence on a helper. This led to brainstorming about "self-setup" programs incorporated into the device, so that the new user could be led through the process in the same way the test leader did with each tester.

handset skins

Posted by james mueller at 2009-10-28 08:23
While these devices are sleek and stylish, nearly all of our testers accepted the silicone covers we offered for their use during testing. They felt that these "skins" made the devices easier to hold securely, or more stable when rested on a surface for one-handed use. Several testers also noted that controls which were difficult to locate on the exterior of the device were indicated with tactile markings on the skin, making them much easier to find and use.

Powered by Plone CMS, the Open Source Content Management System

This site conforms to the following standards: